
BodyLuxe
November 5, 2024
Disclaimer: This article is intended for informational purposes only and should not be taken as medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare professional to determine which treatment or procedure is appropriate for your specific needs.
The pursuit of a healthier body and improved physique is more accessible today than ever before, thanks to scientific advancements and the variety of options available. Two popular pathways for weight loss and body contouring are: (1) surgical methods such as liposuction, and (2) pharmacological interventions like GLP-1 agonists, including Ozempic and Mounjaro. While both methods promise significant results, the right choice for you depends on your health goals, lifestyle, budget, and willingness to accept certain risks.
In recent years, the conversation around GLP-1 agonists has grown significantly. These medications can facilitate weight loss by decreasing appetite and regulating blood sugar levels in patients with diabetes or obesity. However, they come with notable downsides: the cost can be prohibitive (often exceeding $1,000 per month for brand-name Mounjaro), treatment typically requires long-term commitment, and the weight often returns once the medication is discontinued. Furthermore, emerging reports raise concerns about how these drugs may affect skin elasticity, thickness, and overall skin quality in the long run, in addition to well-documented risks of pancreatitis, gall bladder inflammation, bowel motility issues, retinal changes, and thyroid cancer (albeit in a small subset of predisposed patients).
By contrast, liposuction is a well-established surgical method designed to remove fat in targeted areas. One primary benefit of liposuction is its selective approach, allowing a surgeon to remove fat from unwanted spots like the abdomen, hips, or thighs, while sparing areas where volume is desirable (such as the buttocks, breasts, or face). Additionally, the removed fat can potentially be repurposed for fat transfer procedures—like the Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL), breast augmentation, hand rejuvenation, or facial fat grafting—further enhancing body contour. On the other hand, liposuction carries its own set of risks, including potential complications from general anesthesia, although newer methods of minimally-invasive liposuction performed awake are much safer than traditional liposuction under general anesthesia.
In this post, we will delve into the pros and cons of liposuction and GLP-1 agonists. We will explore how each method works, discuss key factors such as cost, potential side effects, long-term commitment, impact on skin quality, and ultimately help you make a more informed decision.
1. Understanding Liposuction
Liposuction is a surgical procedure that involves the removal of excess fat through suction cannulas. The surgeon strategically targets areas like the abdomen, thighs, arms, chin, or back, providing a more contoured shape. It is important to understand that liposuction is not a weight-loss procedure per se—rather, it is a body contouring technique best suited for individuals who are not far from their ideal body weight but struggle with stubborn pockets of fat. Below are some of the primary benefits and considerations. Many surgeons have BMI limits for liposuction, but there are surgeons that will do liposuction for patients whose BMI reaches 40.
One of the biggest advantages of liposuction is that it allows for selective fat removal. If the goal is to reduce belly fat while maintaining or enhancing buttocks and breast volume, liposuction can be carefully planned to avoid those areas. By contrast, medications like GLP-1 agonists often lead to systemic fat loss—meaning your entire body loses fat, including the face, buttocks, and breasts. Many people find that they lose their desired curves, that the face can appear gaunt or older, and that the breasts and buttocks may sag as a result of the overall weight reduction.
Another distinct advantage of liposuction is that the removed fat can be processed on the spot and reinjected into other areas of the body to enhance volume, a technique commonly known as fat transfer or fat grafting. For instance, you could use your own fat to perform a Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) or fat transfer to the breasts. Fat grafting can also be used for hand rejuvenation to restore volume loss due to aging, or to fill facial hollows or wrinkles. This dual-purpose approach can be beneficial for those seeking to sculpt their bodies more holistically.
However, if you rely solely on weight-loss medications and end up losing a large amount of fat overall, you may no longer be a good candidate for these fat transfer procedures. In addition, if weight loss occurs too rapidly or dramatically, the skin can become looser, which can complicate the results of any future body-contouring surgery.
Unlike GLP-1 agonists, which reduce the size of fat cells but do not necessarily remove them, liposuction permanently removes fat cells in the treated area. Although there is the potential for weight regain in other areas of the body if you do not maintain a healthy lifestyle, the contour improvements in the treated region can be long-lasting. Ultimately, liposuction results are typically considered permanent so long as the patient sustains a stable weight.
Liposuction, like any surgery, comes with risks. These can include complications from anesthesia, and the formation of seromas. In the right hands, infection and bleeding after liposuction are incredibly rare. There is also the possibility of uneven results or lumps under the skin, although this is highly unusual if performed by an experienced surgeon. Recovery time is typically a few days to over a week, depending on the extent of the procedure. Bruising, swelling, and discomfort are to be expected in the immediate postoperative period, and wearing compression garments is often advised to help the skin retract and conform to the new body contours.
GLP-1 agonists—such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro—belong to a class of medications originally developed to help manage diabetes by controlling blood sugar levels. Over time, doctors and researchers noticed that these drugs also promoted significant weight loss in many patients. This discovery led to their off-label and FDA-approved uses in individuals who are overweight or obese, transforming the obesity treatment landscape.
GLP-1 agonists work by mimicking the function of the naturally occurring hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. They slow gastric emptying, increase insulin secretion (when blood sugar is high), reduce glucagon release, and suppress appetite. Collectively, these effects can lead to meaningful weight reduction in individuals who adhere to the treatment consistently. However, the process is not selective: fat loss occurs throughout the body without regard for cosmetic concerns. This can result in facial volume loss (“Ozempic face”), sagging buttocks, and decreased breast volume.
One significant caveat to consider is that GLP-1 agonists often require long-term—or even lifelong—commitment. Studies and anecdotal clinical reports have shown that many individuals rapidly regain weight once they discontinue the medication. This is because the medication’s appetite-suppressing effect disappears, and if a person has not made sustainable lifestyle changes, old eating habits may resume, leading to weight gain.
GLP-1 agonists can be very expensive, especially brand-name versions like Mounjaro. In many cases, insurance may not cover the medication if the patient does not meet certain clinical criteria (e.g., having a specific body mass index combined with weight-related comorbidities). For those forced to pay out-of-pocket, the monthly cost can exceed $1,000.
Complicating matters further, the FDA recently removed Mounjaro from the short supply list, which may limit the availability of cheaper, generic versions. As a result, patients wishing to remain on Mounjaro (or switch to it) could find themselves facing higher costs.
While GLP-1 agonists can be effective for weight loss, they are not without significant risks. Potential side effects and complications include:
Additionally, many patients and practitioners have raised concerns about how these drugs might alter skin quality over the long run. Rapid weight loss can sometimes cause the skin to sag, leading to an aged appearance, especially around the face, neck, and other areas that rely heavily on skin elasticity.
3. The Impact on Skin Elasticity, Thickness, and Quality
Whether you opt for liposuction or GLP-1 agonists, skin elasticity is a critical consideration. Skin elasticity naturally declines with age, but rapid or significant weight loss can exacerbate loose or sagging skin.
Liposuction: While liposuction can remove isolated pockets of fat, the final outcome also depends on how well your skin can contract postoperatively. Good skin elasticity is crucial for smooth results. Younger patients and those with more resilient skin tissues typically see better retraction post-liposuction. Skin or subdermal tightening devices such as Renuvion (J Plasma) can also help tighten the skin after liposuction.
GLP-1 Agonists: These drugs can help you lose weight, but they offer no direct support for preserving the volume in “desired” areas, nor do they help maintain skin tone. Many patients report an increase in wrinkles, a hollowed-out look in the cheeks (often called “Ozempic face”), and general skin laxity in previously voluminous areas like the buttocks and breasts.
In cases of extreme skin laxity, additional body contouring surgeries (e.g., tummy tuck, body lift, arm lift, thigh lift) may be required to remove redundant skin and achieve a more aesthetically pleasing contour. However, these procedures come with more scars, higher cost, and additional risks.
It is important to note that some individuals might benefit from a combined approach. For instance, a patient with a high BMI may begin with a medically supervised weight-loss strategy, possibly incorporating GLP-1 agonists, to reduce body weight enough to become a better surgical candidate for liposuction. Once they reach or are close to their ideal weight, they might then opt for liposuction to fine-tune stubborn areas and perhaps transfer the removed fat to other desired areas.
This strategy, however, requires careful timing and planning under the guidance of both a bariatric specialist and a board-certified plastic surgeon. One must also keep in mind that extended or repeated use of GLP-1 agonists—especially if weight losses are significant—could deplete the necessary fat stores for successful fat grafting procedures.
Cost is a major factor in deciding between liposuction and GLP-1 agonists:
Liposuction: The cost depends on the number of areas treated and the surgeon’s expertise, and geographical location, with the coasts being typically more expensive than the Mid-West of the United States. It can range from a several thousand to over $10,000 in total. Although this can be high, it tends to be a one-time expense (unless you opt for multiple procedures).
GLP-1 Agonists: Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro can cost over $1,000 per month if you are paying out-of-pocket. This is a recurring expense that could add up to many thousands of dollars annually. Even for those with insurance coverage, co-pays and deductibles may be expensive, especially if the insurance requires you to meet a high deductible first.
Combining Both Approaches: Some people may choose short-term use of GLP-1 agonists to jumpstart weight loss before undergoing liposuction. The total cost of this approach could be even higher, but for certain individuals with a high BMI, it might be the most effective route.
When deciding between liposuction and GLP-1 agonists, consider the following:
Overall Health: If you have type 2 diabetes or obesity-related comorbidities, GLP-1 agonists may offer both weight loss and improved metabolic control. However, if you are close to your goal weight and simply want to target specific areas, liposuction may be more suitable.
Budget: Can you afford a one-time surgical fee, or are you prepared to pay for long-term prescription costs that can exceed $1,000 per month? Insurance coverage and availability also play a significant role.
Desired Aesthetic Outcomes: If preserving or enhancing curves in specific areas is important, liposuction plus fat transfer might be a more direct route. GLP-1 agonists cause widespread fat loss, which can lead to an older or more deflated appearance in the face, buttocks, and breasts.
Commitment Level: Are you willing to make a potentially lifelong commitment to a medication that may have side effects? Or do you prefer a surgical solution with a finite recovery period?
Risks and Side Effects: Both approaches carry risks—surgical complications in the case of liposuction and potential for pancreatitis, gallbladder issues, or gastroparesis with GLP-1 agonists. Weigh these risks against your current health status and medical history.
Skin Quality: Significant weight loss from any method can lead to loose skin. Assess your skin’s elasticity and consider whether additional body-contouring procedures might be needed.
One aspect that has generated recent controversy is the removal of Mounjaro from the short supply list by the FDA, hence limiting the legality of cheaper generic versions of tirzepatide. Shortages often lead to price fluctuations and reduced access to generic or lower-cost versions. If generics become more restricted, those who rely on GLP-1 agonists could face higher monthly expenses or find it difficult to secure a consistent supply.
As for liposuction, while technology continues to advance—offering less invasive procedures and better instruments for fat transfer—the cost structure largely remains consistent.
Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to the question of whether to do liposuction or go on GLP-1 agonists. The best approach is often highly individualized, taking into account medical history, body composition, lifestyle, financial resources, and long-term goals. Some individuals might benefit from a staged approach—losing a moderate amount of weight medically, then using liposuction to sculpt problem areas. Others might find liposuction alone sufficient if their primary concern is localized fat deposits. Those who have significant weight to lose and metabolic concerns might opt for the medication route first, fully aware that long-term use may be necessary to maintain those results, and that the aesthetic changes might not be as targeted as surgical approaches.
In a world where body image and health are high priorities for many, both liposuction and GLP-1 agonists offer solutions, albeit with very different mechanisms, costs, and long-term implications. Liposuction provides immediate, localized fat reduction and the potential for fat transfer to other areas of the body. However, it is a surgical procedure with inherent although minimal risks (especially if performed awake) and requires a certain level of pre-surgery fitness and health. GLP-1 agonists like Ozempic and Mounjaro can offer significant weight loss and improved metabolic parameters, but they often require a long-term commitment, can be extremely expensive, and do not discriminate when it comes to where fat is lost.
Moreover, individuals who discontinue these medications frequently regain the lost weight. Concerns about skin elasticity, thickness, and overall skin quality have arisen, along with possible severe side effects such as gastroparesis, pancreatitis, gallbladder inflammation, and bowel obstruction. These issues can carry serious health risks and may negate some of the positives of pharmacological weight loss.
For those interested in procedures like Brazilian Butt Lift, breast fat transfer, hand rejuvenation, or facial fat grafting, losing too much fat overall or undergoing excessive weight fluctuations can render them ineligible for these treatments or compromise their results. Liposuction, on the other hand, can strategically remove fat from certain areas while leaving volume intact in others, thus maintaining or even enhancing your body’s natural curves. Additionally, as the FDA’s stance on drug supply for medications like Mounjaro evolves, and with generic forms potentially becoming scarce, the cost burden on patients could become even more substantial.
The ideal solution is a personalized one: a thorough consultation with both a board-certified plastic surgeon and a medical weight-loss specialist is advised to map out your unique risks, financial constraints, health considerations, and body-contouring objectives. Whether you decide on surgical fat removal, GLP-1 agonist therapy, or a combination strategy, taking a holistic approach—incorporating balanced nutrition, exercise, and general wellness habits—will yield the best and most sustainable results.
Final Note: If your aim is targeted body contouring and preserving (or even enhancing) your natural curves, liposuction may provide a more predictable, lasting outcome. However, if you need to address systemic weight or serious metabolic health issues, GLP-1 agonists (alongside lifestyle modifications) could be beneficial—just be prepared for the associated costs, long-term medication usage, and possible side effects. Whichever path you choose, remember that consistency, realistic expectations, and professional medical advice are your allies in achieving a healthier and more confident you.
Fat removal, Liposuction, BBL, Fat Transfers, and Body Contouring on Michigan Ave in downtown Chicago by Daniel J Farrugia MD PhD FACS
(312) 999-5505
John Hancock Center – 875 N Michigan Ave Ste 3620, Chicago, IL 60611
March Madness is here, and BodyLuxe is putting you in the winning bracket! Score up to $6,000 off our most popular procedures—like FormSculpt Lipo, Brazilian Butt Lift, Fat Transfer (to the Breasts or Hands), Skin Tightening, or a Mini Tummy Tuck—and treat yourself to a championship-level transformation.
Don’t let this offer get benched—spots are limited. Click below to schedule your consultation and step onto the court with a silhouette that’s sure to take you all the way to victory!